11:57 pm: Revenge of the Sith review
This review contains spoilersThere's still no blood in the Star Wars universe, but there is a lot of clean dismemberment. (Combined with
Sin City, this is a big year for severed limbs in Hollywood.)
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith certainly addresses a lot of complaints about the first two prequels. Instead of slow openings, Sith drops the viewer directly into the action, first a massive space battle and then more personal derring-do inside one of those ships. There's no cutesiness, in fact there whole thing is quite sombre. Some of the set-piece action scenes are breathtaking. There's also a great sense of scale. There's an impressive sequence when we see Palpatine seizing power and issuing an order that makes the clone troopers sucker-punch the Jedi to death on multiple planets. That, in turn, is part of an unexpectedly political subtext against the Bush administration.
The flaws are many: Lucas still can't write dialog to save his life, and character actors like Ewan McGregor and Samuel L. Jackson have their talent squandered and never get a chance to breath life into their characters. Hayden Christiansen makes Keanu Reeves look like Olivier. The sets are too sparse and cold; one of Lucas' great accomplishments was to create a futuristic world that looked like people actually lived in it.
Female characters get short shrift. All the interesting ones are shunted offstage into secondary texts, like the Clone Wars TV series, novels and comics. Amidala is practically the
only female character with dialog in the whole movie. And her role is mainly to look sad, give birth and die.
And yet... here's what was so startling about the climax of the story, that cut through the limitations of the actors and the stilted dialog. Anakin Skywalker indirectly killed Amidala, in true Darth Vader fashion, by telekinetically choking her. Why did he do this? She confronted him about the lying and killing he has been doing throughout the movie, a last ditch attempt to pull him back from the edge.
He attacked her to shut her up. Amidala died from
domestic violence.
It's a valid point, if made bluntly: that if you use violence and deceit in the political sphere, even for what you consider good reasons, you risk bringing violence and deceit into the personal sphere. Revenge of the Sith is not only the decline and fall of a state, it's the decline and fall of a family. It seems like the true face of the dark side of the Force is not rage or greed or fear, but paternalism.
Revenge of the Sith isn't a good movie, but it certainly is a vast improvement over the previous two prequels. It has a stronger emotional impact than it has any right to have.
Critical judgement isn't really important when talking about the Star Wars cultural phenomenon, however. The movies exist as the foundation for a vast array of secondary materials: prose, poetry, art, films, cartoons, video games, comics and more. Some of it is produced under the aegis of Lucasfilm. Far, far more of it is created by fans for fans. In that sense,
Sith succeeds because it creates a solid foundation for all those secondary texts. That is what Star Wars is for.
Tags: review,
science fiction,
star wars